On January 1, 2011, Lavery
Corporation leased equipment to Flynn Corporation. Both Lavery and Flynn use
private enterprise GAAP and have calendar year ends. The following information
pertains to this lease.
1. The term of the
non-cancellable lease is six years, with no renewal option. The equipment
reverts to the lessor at the termination of the lease, at which time it is
expected to have a residual value (not guaranteed) of $6,000. Flynn Corporation
depreciates all its equipment on a straight-line basis.
2. Equal rental
payments are due on January 1 of each year, beginning in 2011.
3. The equipment’s
fair value on January 1, 2011, is $144,000 and its cost to Lavery is $111,000.
4. The equipment has
an economic life of seven years.
5. Lavery set the
annual rental to ensure a 9% rate of return. Flynn’s incremental borrowing rate
is 10% and the lessor’s implicit rate is unknown to the lessee.
6. Collectibility of
lease payments is reasonably predictable and there are no important
uncertainties about any unreimbursable costs that have not yet been incurred by
the lessor.
Instructions
(a) Explain clearly
why this lease is a capital lease to Flynn and a sales-type lease to Lavery.
(b) Using time value
of money tables, a financial calculator, or computer spreadsheet functions,
calculate the amount of the annual rental payment.
(c) Prepare all
necessary journal entries for Flynn for 2011.
(d) Prepare all
necessary journal entries for Lavery for 2011.
(e) Discuss the
differences, if any, in the classification of the lease to Lavery Corporation
(the lessor) or to Flynn Corporation (the lessee) if both were using IFRS in
their financial reporting.
(a) This is
a capital lease to Flynn since the lease term is 75% (6 ÷ 7) of the asset’s economic
life. In addition, the present value of the minimum lease payments is more than
90% of the fair value of the asset.
This
is a sales-type lease to Lavery since the lease is a capital lease to Flynn,
the lessee, and because the collectability of the lease payments is reasonably
predictable, there are no important uncertainties surrounding the
unreimbursable costs yet to be incurred by the lessor and the fair value of the
equipment ($144,000) exceeds the lessor’s cost ($111,000).
(b) Calculation
of annual rental payment:
$144,000
|
–
|
$6,000
|
X
|
0.59627*
|
=
|
$28,718
|
4.8897**
|
**Present value of $1 at 9% for 6 periods.
**Present
value of an annuity due at 9% for 6 periods.
Excel
formula =PMT(rate,nper,pv,fv,type)
|
Using a
financial calculator:
|
||
PV
|
$ (144,000)
|
|
I
|
9%
|
|
N
|
6
|
|
PMT
|
$ ?
|
Yields $28,718
|
FV
|
$ 6,000
|
|
Type
|
1
|
(c)
1/1/08 Leased Equipment................................................ 137,582
Lease
Obligation....................................... 137,582
($28,718
X 4.79079)***
Lease
Obligation................................................... 28,718
Cash............................................................ 28,718
***Present value of an annuity due
at 10% for 6 periods.
Excel
formula =PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)
|
Using a
financial calculator:
|
||
PV
|
$ ?
|
Yields $137,582
|
I
|
10%
|
|
N
|
6
|
|
PMT
|
$ (28,718)
|
|
FV
|
$ 0
|
|
Type
|
1
|
12/31/11 Depreciation Expense............................................ 22,930
Accumulated
Depreciation................... 22,930
($137,582
÷ 6 years)
Interest
Expense.................................................. 10,886
Interest
Payable..................................... 10,886
[($137,582
– $28,718) X .10]
(d)
1/1/08 Lease Payments Receivable........................ 178,308 *
Cost
of Goods Sold......................................... 107,422
Sales.................................................... 140,422
Inventory............................................. 111,000
Unearned
Interest Income—
Leases.................................. 34,308 **
*($28,718
X 6) + $6,000
**$178,308
– $144,000
Since the residual value is not
guaranteed, the present value of the residual value of $6,000 is excluded from
both sales and cost of goods sold.
Sales $144,000
Less present value of residual
value 3,578*
$140,422
Cost of Goods Sold $111,000
Less present value of residual
value 3,578*
$107,422
*($6,000 X .59627**)
**Present value of $1 at 9% for 6
periods.
Cash ............................................................. 28,718
Lease
Payments
Receivable.......................... 28,718
12/31/11 Unearned Interest Income—
Leases.............................................. 10,375
Interest
Income—Leases................. 10,375
[($144,000
– $28,718) X .09]
(c) For Lavery Corporation—(the
lessee):
Rather
than using quantitative factors such as the 75 percent and the 90 percent
hurdles often referred to as the bright lines used in PE GAAP, the IFRS
criteria use qualitative factors to establish whether or not the risks and
rewards of ownership are transferred to the lessee, and supports classification
as a finance lease:
1.
There is reasonable assurance that the lessee will obtain
ownership of the leased property by the end of the lease term. If there is a
bargain purchase option in the lease, it is assumed that the lessee will
exercise it and obtain ownership of the asset.
2.
The lease term is long enough that the lessee will receive
substantially all of the economic benefits that are expected to be derived from
using the leased property over its life.
3.
The lease allows the lessor to recover substantially all of
its investment in the leased property and to earn a return on the investment.
Evidence of this is provided if the present value of the minimum lease payments
is close to the fair value of the leased asset.
4.
The leased assets are so specialized that, without major
modification, they are of use only to the lessee.
None
of the numerical thresholds need be applied, as was the case in PE GAAP, and so
the treatment of the lease by the lessee would be the same, although it would
be referred to as a finance lease, rather than a direct financing lease.
For
Flynn Corporation—(the lessor):
Under IFRS, the lease would receive
the same treatment as under PE GAAP except the criteria need not include the two revenue recognition-based tests
concerning collectability and estimating unreimbursable costs. Instead of being
referred to as a sales-type lease, the lease would be referred to as a finance
lease—manufacturer or dealer.