Sunday, 24 July 2016

Write a brief essay highlighting the differences between IFRS

Write a brief essay highlighting the differences between IFRS and accounting standards for private enterprises noted in this chapter, discussing the conceptual justification for each.


There are only a few differences between IFRS and ASPE with respect to reporting errors, and changes in policies and estimates.  Primarily, ASPE follows historical practice in Canada.   Given that generally the primary users of private enterprise financial statements are creditors who have access to management; the disclosure has also been simplified.

These differences are highlighted below:
a)            The hierarchy of accounting policies to follow when there is no standard is very similar.
b)            ASPE has choices in a number of specifically identified accounting policies where a change in policy can be made without justification as to why it is more relevant.  Examples of these standards include income taxes, defined benefit pension plans, consolidation of subsidiaries and development costs. ASPE has these choices to keep the reporting and measurement of these items more simple, so preparers may choose the simpler method if they want, even if it results in reliable but less relevant information.
c)            ASPE requires that errors be corrected using only retrospective restatement. The reason for this is to follow historical practice in Canada. IFRS allows partial retrospective restatement or prospective treatment when the information is impracticable to determine.
d)           ASPE does not require an additional opening balance sheet for the earliest period restated when applying retrospective treatment. This disclosure is not required in order to keep the notes to a minimal and reduce the preparer’s time.

e)            ASPE does not require disclosure on issued standards not yet effective.  This will simplify the disclosure for the primary users, who are the creditors.