Various
types of accounting changes can affect the financial statements of a private
business enterprise differently. Assume that each item on the following list
would have a material effect on the financial statements of a private enterprise
in the current year:
1.
A change to the income taxes payable method from the tax liability method
2.
A change in the estimated useful life of previously recorded capital assets
where the straight-line depreciation method is used
3.
A change from deferring and amortizing development costs to immediate
recognition. The change to immediate recognition arises because the company
does not have the resources to market the new product adequately
4.
A change from including the employer share of CPP premiums with Payroll Tax
Expenses to including it with Salaries and Wages Expense on the income
statement
5.
The correction of a mathematical error in inventory costing that was made in a
prior period
6.
A change from straight-line amortization to a double-declining method in
recognition of the effect that technology has on the pattern of benefits
received from the asset’s use
7.
A change from presenting unconsolidated statements (using the cost method for
the subsidiaries) to presenting consolidated statements for the company and its
two long-held subsidiaries
8.
A change in the method of accounting for leases for tax purposes to conform
with the financial accounting method; as a result, both future and current
taxes payable changed substantially
9.
A change from the periodic inventory method to the perpetual method with the
introduction of scanning equipment and updated computer software
10.
A change in an accounting method due to a change in a primary source of GAAP
Instructions
Identify
the type of accounting change that is described in each item, and indicate
whether the prior years’ financial statements must be restated when they are
presented in comparative form with the current year’s statements. Also indicate
if the company is required to justify the change.
Item
Change
|
|
Type of Change
|
|
Restatement
of Prior Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
This appears to be a voluntary change in an
accounting policy which is allowed under ASPE. The company has adopted the taxes payable
method. There is no justification that
is required that this represents more relevant information. .
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
An accounting change involving a change in an
accounting estimate.
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
This may represent a change in an accounting policy
or a change in an estimate. If it is a
change in the accounting policy to expense all development costs from now on,
then under ASPE, there is no requirement to disclose why the change was made
or why it is more relevant. But
retrospective application would be required and prior year’s statements
adjusted.
However, it may be that the conditions for these
particular development costs have changed.
This then means that the estimated future benefits arising from these
capitalized development costs have changed (declined). This would then be a change in an estimate
and disclosure would be required if material.
Not all situations are clear cut and students should
be aware that alternative answers may be justified.
|
|
Yes
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Treated as if it were an
error correction, as a change in classification.
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
An error correction.
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
This is a change in estimate from a change in the
pattern of benefits.
|
|
No
|
Item
Change
|
|
Type of Change
|
|
Restatement
of Prior Years
|
7.
|
|
Under ASPE, the company has a choice to report
subsidiaries as consolidated, or using either the equity method or the cost
method. This is a voluntary change in
an accounting policy and requires retrospective application. However, the standard does not require the
company to justify that the change is more relevant.
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Not a change in accounting policy. Simply, a change
in tax accounting; done prospectively.
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
This change should not have any impact on the
financial statements. The cost of goods sold and the ending inventory should
be the same regardless of whether the periodic or perpetual method was used.
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
|
A change in accounting principle that results from
applying the transitional provisions of a primary source of GAAP.
|
|
Yes/No*
|
* The treatment would be specified in the
transitional provisions of the new accounting pronouncement.