The
following are various types of accounting changes:
_______
1. Change in a plant asset’s residual value
_______
2. Change due to an overstatement of inventory
_______
3. Change from sum-of-the-years’-digits to straight-line method of depreciation
because of a change in the pattern of benefits received
_______
4. Change in a primary source of GAAP
_______
5. Change in decision by management from not capitalizing interest during
construction to capitalizing it because the change increases the relevance of
the resulting information. The company is reporting a self-constructed asset
for the first time.
_______
6. Change in the rate used to calculate warranty costs
_______
7. Change from an unacceptable accounting principle to an acceptable accounting
principle
_______
8. Change in a patent’s amortization period
_______
9. Change from the zero-profit method to the percentage-of-completion method on
construction contracts because the company now accepts longer commercial
contracts rather than shorter residential contracts
_______
10. Recognition of additional income taxes owing from three years ago as a
result of improper calculations by the accountant, who was not familiar with
income tax legislation and income tax returns
Instructions
(a)
For each change or error, use the following code letters to indicate how it
would be accounted for assuming the company follows IFRS:
Accounted
for in the current year only (CY)
Accounted
for prospectively (P)
Accounted
for retrospectively (R)
None
of the above, or unable to tell. Explain. (NA)
(b)
Identify the type of change for each of the situations in items 1 to 10.
(c)
Now assume that the company follows ASPE. Identify the situations in part (a)
that would be accounted for differently under ASPE than IFRS.
(d)
What are the conditions that must exist for an entity to be allowed to change
an accounting policy?
(a) and (b) Accounting
treatment under IFRS:
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
|
Accounting treatment
|
Type of change
|
1.
|
P
|
Change in estimate
|
2.
|
R
|
Accounting error correction
|
3.
|
P
|
Change in estimate
|
4.
|
NA*
|
Change in policy
|
5.
|
P
|
Not an accounting change – selection of policy for
first time.
|
6.
|
P
|
Change in estimate
|
7.
|
R
|
Accounting error correction
|
8.
|
P
|
Change in estimate
|
9.
|
P
|
Application of a new accounting policy to transactions
that differ in substance from those previously occurring
|
10.
|
R
|
Accounting error correction
|
* The accounting treatment would be specified in the
transitional provisions of the new source of GAAP. If not specified, then apply retrospectively.
The only two approaches that are
permitted for reporting changes are retrospective and prospective
treatment. Accounting for the change in
the current year only is not permitted under either IFRS or ASPE. When new or
revised sources of primary GAAP are adopted, recommendations are usually
included that specify how an entity should handle the transition. These are
called transitional provisions.
There is a major difference between
ASPE and IFRS in accounting for retrospective changes in that IFRS allows
partial retrospective treatment and ASPE doesn’t. In addition, under IFRS, an opening balance
sheet must be provided for the earliest comparative period provided when there
is a retrospective change.
(c) Accounting treatment under ASPE (if different
than part (a) for IFRS):
There would be no differences to the
accounting treatment for the above noted items between IFRS and ASPE, however
some items have special considerations worth noting.
(5) IAS 23 requires that interest be
capitalized for qualifying assets, whereas ASPE still permits a choice between
capitalization and expensing, provided that the company is consistently
applying the policy. Given that the situation is one where this is the first
time they have constructed a building for their own purposes then it’s not a
change at all, but rather the selection of a policy for the first time.
(9) Under current IFRS (IAS 11 and IAS 18),
the percentage of completion method is the preferred method of accounting for
long-term contracts. If the outcome cannot be reliably measured, recoverable
revenues equal to costs are recognized under IAS 11 and IAS 18 (sometimes
referred to as the zero profit method). No gross profit is recorded until the
contract is completed and the gross profit can be reliably measured. IFRS does
not provide the choice of the completed contract method. Under accounting
standards for private enterprises (ASPE), the percentage of completion method
is again the preferred method of accounting for long-term contracts. However,
the completed contract method is allowed as a default method for long-term
contracts under ASPE where the percentage complete cannot be reliably measured.
Under the completed contract method, revenue would only be recorded when the
contract is completed.
(d) Under IFRS, one of the following two situations
is required for a change in an accounting policy to be acceptable:
1. The change is required by a
primary source of GAAP.
2. A voluntary change results in the financial
statements presenting reliable and more relevant information
about the effects of the transactions, events, or conditions on the entity’s
financial position, financial performance, or cash flows.
Accounting standards for private enterprises
provide for further situations where an accounting policy change may be made
without having to meet the “reliable and more relevant” criteria in the second
situation above. It allows the following voluntary changes in policy to be
made:
3. Between or among alternative private
enterprise GAAP methods of accounting and reporting for investments in
subsidiary companies, and in companies where the investor has significant
influence or joint control; for expenditures during the development phase on
internally generated intangible assets; for defined benefit plans; for
accounting for income taxes; and for measuring the equity component of a
financial instrument that has both a liability and equity component at zero.
These further situations allowed under private
enterprise accounting standards as an acceptable change in accounting policy
relate to standards where accounting policy choices have to be made. These
changes are treated as voluntary changes, but they do not have to meet the
“reliable and more relevant” hurdle required of other voluntary changes.
Although not specifically stated in the actual standard, it is assumed that
once that choice has been made, the same policy is followed consistently.