Thursday, 21 July 2016

In an examination of Kelsey Corporation Ltd. as of December

In an examination of Kelsey Corporation Ltd. as of December 31, 2011, you have learned that the following situations exist. No entries have been made in the accounting records for these items. Kelsey follows IFRS.
1. The corporation erected its present factory building in 1996. Depreciation was calculated by the straight-line method, using an estimated life of 35 years. Early in 2011, the board of directors conducted a careful survey and estimated that the factory building had a remaining useful life of 25 years as of January 1, 2011.
2. An additional assessment of 2011 income taxes was levied and paid in 2012.
3. When calculating the accrual for officers’ salaries at December 31, 2011, it was discovered that the accrual for officers’ salaries for December 31, 2010, had been overstated.
4. On December 15, 2011, Kelsey Corporation Ltd. declared a stock dividend of 1,000 common shares per 100,000 of its common shares outstanding, distributable February 1, 2012, to the common shareholders of record on December 31, 2011.
5. Kelsey Corporation Ltd., which is on a calendar-year basis, changed its inventory method as of January 1, 2011. The inventory for December 31, 2010, was costed by the average method, and the inventory for December 31, 2011, was costed by the FIFO method. Kelsey is changing its inventory method as it presented more reliable and more relevant information.
6. Kelsey has guaranteed the payment of interest on the 20-year first mortgage bonds of Bonbee Inc., an affiliate. Outstanding bonds of Bonbee Inc. amount to $150,000 with interest payable at 10% per annum, due June 1 and December 1 of each year. The bonds were issued by Bonbee Inc., on December 1, 2007, and all interest payments have been met by the company with the exception of the payment due December 1, 2011. Kelsey states that it will pay the defaulted interest to the bondholders on January 15, 2012.
7. During the year 2011, Kelsey Corporation Ltd. was named as a defendant in a suit for damages by Anand Shahid Corporation for breach of contract. The case was decided in favour of Anand Shahid Corporation, which was awarded $80,000 damages. At the time of the audit, the case was under appeal to a higher court.

Instructions
Describe fully how each of the items should be reported in the financial statements of Kelsey Corporation Ltd. for the year 2011.


1.  This is a change in estimate and should be applied to the calculations for 2011 on a prospective basis. If the impact of the change on depreciation expense is material, note disclosure explaining the change in estimate and the effect on earnings is required.

2.  Since income taxes are self-assessed by companies, additional assessments of prior years’ amounts occasionally happen. This is considered a revision of an estimate and the additional amount of income tax is expensed in 2011. If the additional income taxes stem from an error in the preparation of the tax return, such as unreported revenues or over-estimation of deductions, the assessment would be treated as an accounting error. If the amounts are determined and adjusted prior to the release of 2011 financial statements, no particular disclosure is required. If not, such an accounting error is recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Comparative financial statement amounts are restated and note disclosure explaining the nature of the error and the statement items adjusted would be included.

3.  The overstatement of 2010 officers’ salaries is an accounting error. Any impact on 2011 expenses would be corrected in the current year and the opening balance of retained earnings would be adjusted net of any related income tax effect. Comparative financial statement amounts and earning per share amounts are restated and note disclosure explaining the nature of the error and the statement items adjusted would be included.

4.  The stock dividend reduces retained earnings on the date of declaration. It would therefore be shown on the 2011 statement of retained earnings. Since the stock dividend is not issued before year-end, there would also be a Stock Dividend Distributable balance included in the Share Capital section of Shareholders’ Equity. Earnings per share would be adjusted as if the shares had been outstanding throughout the year 2011.

5.  This is a voluntary change in accounting policy as a result of switching to a policy that provides more reliable and more relevant information. Kelsey will need to record an adjustment to opening retained earnings for the change in policy, net of any related income tax effect and restate the comparative statements. Note disclosure is required explaining the change in policy and the reason for the change. The method of applying the change (full or partial retrospective) must be disclosed as well as the impact of the change on individual statement items.

6.  The guarantee should be (and should have been) disclosed in the notes to the financial statements as a significant commitment. Since Bonbee Inc. has defaulted on an interest payment, Kelsey must also determine how to account for the contingent liability. For the interest component already due, this should be shown as a current liability and an expense or loss charged to income (or a receivable set up if it is considered that an asset exists in terms of collectability from Bonbee). If Kelsey considers the possibility of having to honour the principal amount of the bonds of Bonbee likely and measurable, then a loss and liability will be accrued in the 2011 financial statements.

    In this case, Bonbee indicates that the defaulted interest will be paid on January 15, 2012. This is a subsequent event that provides evidence of a condition that existed at year end. The January date will likely occur before Kelsey’s financial statements are issued and will provide additional information to help Kelsey determine how to account for the contingency. If the interest is not paid on January 15, 2012, it becomes more likely that Kelsey will have to honour the guarantee. Kelsey may have to include a note that the possibility of loss is not determinable, or accrue the loss and liability in its year end financial statements. If the interest is paid, Kelsey may be satisfied that the likelihood of loss is not likely. In either case, Kelsey will have to examine the underlying cause of Bonbee’s missed interest payment to determine the likelihood of the guarantee being enforced against Kelsey.

7. This is a contingent liability. The accounting treatment depends on Kelsey’s legal counsel’s evaluation of the likelihood of loss on appeal. If the company estimates that it is unlikely or undeterminable that they will lose the appeal then no accrual is required. This position would be doubtful however since the company has already been found in breach of contract. The company will have to accrue the loss and liability. Additional note disclosure is required describing the contingent liability and whether any unaccrued additional exposure to loss exists.