Companies
provide other employee future benefits in addition to defined benefit pension
plans. In many cases, these obligations and expenses can be significant, but
often are ignored. Access the 2009 fiscal year-end statements for the following
companies from SEDAR (www.sedar.com): BCE Inc., Potash Corp., Canadian Pacific
Railway, and Air Canada.
Instructions
(a)
For each company, outline the other employee future benefits that are provided.
Detail the assumptions that have been used to account for these other employee
future benefits.
(b)
For each company, provide the following:
1.
Funded status of the pension plans
2.
Pension expense
3.
Funded status of the other employee future benefits
4.
Other employee future benefit expense and any plan assets to support the other
employee future benefits
(c)
Comment on the relative amounts of the deficit and expenses of the pension
plans and the other benefits. What impact does this have on any analysis
completed for companies?
(a)
BCE Inc. provides health care and life
insurance benefits for retirees. These
benefits are being phased over a ten year period ending in December, 2016.The
assumptions used are 6.4% to 7.0% for the discount rate, and health care rates of 4.5%, compensation
increases of 3% and expected return on the plan assets of 7.25%.
Potash provides health care and life
insurance benefits for retirees. The assumptions used are 5.85% to 6.25% for
the discount rate, and health care
rates of 6%.
Canadian National Railway provides medical
and life insurance benefits for retirees and for a closed group of employees
free rail passes during retirement.
Assumptions stated: Discount rate is 6.01%, to 6.84% and rate increase in
health care costs are 11% for 2009 and 2010, with cost trend rates declining to
4.5% by 2028 and compensation increases of 3.5%
Air Canada provides other post-employment
benefits such as health, life and disability. Assumptions stated: Discount rate is 6.25%, to
7.35% and rate increase in health care costs are 8.25%, with cost trend rates
declining to 5.00% by 2015 and compensation increases of 2.5%
(b) in $millions
|
Pension Deficit
|
Pension
Expense
|
Other Benefits Deficit
|
Other benefits expense
|
Plan asset for other benefits
|
BCE Inc.
|
1,611
|
239
|
1,431
|
71
|
191
|
Potash Corp
|
143.3
|
40.6
|
275.9
|
23.2
|
0
|
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
|
(624) surplus
|
(34)
|
286
|
19
|
0
|
Air Canada
|
1,186
|
(20)
|
851
|
63
|
0
|
(c) From the analysis in part
(b), we find the following for each company:
BCE – the other benefits
deficit is 89% of the pension deficit, and the expense is about 30% of the
defined benefit plan expense. This
indicates that the other employee benefits have a significant impact on the
company’s report.
Potash – In the case of
Potash, the deficit for the other benefits is 190% higher than the pension
deficit indicating it is a significant expense.
The other benefit expense is about 57% of the defined benefit pension
expense.
CNR – Although CNR’s defined
benefit plan is in a surplus, its other benefit plan obligation is in a deficit
of $286 million. In addition, although
the defined benefit expense is showing a net gain position, the other benefits
expense is $19 million.
Air Canada – Air Canada`s
other benefit obligation is 72% of the defined benefit deficit. The other benefit expense is $63 million
whereas the defined benefit expense shows a net gain.
From the four companies
analyzed above, it is obvious that the other future benefits obligations are
just as significant (or more in some cases) as the defined benefit obligations,
and should be considered as part of any analysis.