Saturday, 23 July 2016

Angus Farms Ltd., which uses ASPE, had the following transactions

Angus Farms Ltd., which uses ASPE, had the following transactions during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
1. On May 1, a used tractor was sold at auction. The information concerning this transaction included:
Original cost of the tractor …………………………………..$52,000
Carrying amount of tractor at date of sale …………………..  14,000
Cash proceeds obtained at sale ……………………………… 22,500
2. After the seeding season, on June 15, 2011, a plough with an original cost of $6,000 and a carrying amount of $500 was discarded.
3. On September 1, 2011, a new plough was purchased for $7,700.
4. On December 30, a section of land was sold to a neighbouring farm called Clear Pastures Ltd. The original cost of the land was $45,000. To finance the purchase Clear Pastures gave Angus a three-year mortgage note in the amount of $75,000 that carries interest at 5%, with interest payable annually each December 30.
5. On December 31, 2011, depreciation was recorded on the farm equipment in the amount of $12,600.

Instructions
(a) Prepare the journal entries that recorded the transactions during the year.
(b) Prepare the sections of the cash flow statement of Angus Farms Ltd. to report the transactions provided, using the indirect format.
(c) Prepare the sections of the cash flow statement of Angus Farms Ltd. to report the transactions provided, using the direct format.
(d) What results do you notice when comparing the information arrived at in parts (b) and (c) above?


(a)
2011
May   1 Cash............................. 22,500
        Accumulated Depreciation......... 38,000
           Gain on Disposal...............          8,500
           Tractor........................         52,000
      
June 15 Accumulated Depreciation.........   5,500
        Loss on Disposal.................     500
           Farm Equipment.................          6,000

Sept. 1 Farm Equipment...................   7,700
           Cash...........................          7,700

Dec. 30 Mortgage Note Receivable......... 75,000
           Gain on Disposal...............         30,000
           Land...........................         45,000

     31 Depreciation Expense............. 12,600
           Accumulated Depreciation.......         12,600
                                                
(b) Indirect method:
    Operating activities:
      Depreciation expense                $12,600
      Loss on disposal of equipment           500
      Gain on sale of equipment            (8,500)
      Gain on sale of land                (30,000)

    Investing activities:
      Sale of equipment                    22,500
      Purchase of equipment                (7,700)
   
Note X:   Significant non-cash investing and financing activities:
       A mortgage note receivable of $75,000 was obtained from the sale of land.

(c) Direct method:
    Operating activities:
     
    Investing activities:
      Sale of equipment                    22,500
      Purchase of equipment                (7,700)
   
Note X:   Significant non-cash investing and financing activities:
       A mortgage note receivable of $75,000 was obtained from the sale of land.


 (d) Although at first glance it might appear as if the results from operating activities using the two formats differ. In fact they do not.  Whereas in the indirect method four adjustments appear to remove their effect on net income, the starting point of the indirect method. These four items are listed to adjust accrual net income to cash from operating activities. The four items listed were included in income, and so their effect has to be removed by these adjustments as they do not involve operating activities.